tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3441020117205433950.post8466740439801729252..comments2023-11-04T23:31:40.392-10:00Comments on got windmills?: HARDENED BONEHEADSAndy Parxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15398587036690312685noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3441020117205433950.post-71705726811754092622008-09-17T17:01:00.000-10:002008-09-17T17:01:00.000-10:00Jees, Parx. Yeah, where DID you get your info? Pro...Jees, Parx. Yeah, where DID you get your info? Proof once again that you just make it up as you go. No wonder they don't let you be a real journalist.Got Facts?https://www.blogger.com/profile/08118005195931312952noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3441020117205433950.post-46313674709496619582008-09-17T14:28:00.000-10:002008-09-17T14:28:00.000-10:00You misunderstood me. It was the judge who said, “...You misunderstood me. It was the judge who said, “after jackets and footings were already poured." I was relaying what the judge had said. <BR/><BR/>Your factual claims about the concrete and the burials are new information. Nobody has alleged before that concrete was poured over bones, and I think it's generally accepted by all parties that none of the footings is over <I>known</I> burials (I think there's concern that all the burials are not necessarily known and footings could conceivably be over deeply buried unknown remains). Who told you your information? They should be a witness at the upcoming burial council meeting.<BR/><BR/>I think you confuse declining to condemn the developer with "siding with" the developer. My interests are the legal ins and outs of the situation. If the developer were violating the law, I'd certainly be talking about that. It's not like I would 'spin' on his behalf because I'm "on his side" or whatever.charley fosterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17403608230516187902noreply@blogger.com