tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3441020117205433950.post86563685721700674..comments2023-11-04T23:31:40.392-10:00Comments on got windmills?: SMELLS LIKE IT, TASTES LIKE IT, SURE GLAD WE DIDN’T STEP IN ITAndy Parxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15398587036690312685noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3441020117205433950.post-68911305433601645722008-06-07T11:13:00.000-10:002008-06-07T11:13:00.000-10:00-- you Andy. Your willful ignorance is only excee...-- you Andy. Your willful ignorance is only exceeded by your bile.<BR/><BR/>You've yet to offer one fact in refutation to dozens of links and cites. Can you? Or is that too much work for a "journalist" (sic) of your great stature?<BR/><BR/>Funny how you mock the pols for lying to you but you'll believe the bits and pieces you wish too.<BR/><BR/>There is no requirement for a bike/pedestrian path to be mostly for transportation. That's your myth and your Mickensian great lie. <BR/><BR/>You're lazy, rude and little more than a sideshow for the rest of us to snigger at as you flap around making a fool of yourself.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3441020117205433950.post-43566830794443185432008-06-07T09:23:00.000-10:002008-06-07T09:23:00.000-10:00Still at it anonymous babooze- now with another ma...Still at it anonymous babooze- now with another made up funding source- I guess you’re taking the big lie tact now- just keep repeating it and people will believe it. Pretty convenient staying in the closet to do your lying.<BR/><BR/>OK- now post your drivel another 10times and I’ll ignore it for another week. Say hi to your master Thomas Noyes.Andy Parxhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15398587036690312685noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3441020117205433950.post-74849435300372560832008-06-06T22:57:00.000-10:002008-06-06T22:57:00.000-10:00Shock and amazement.It's not like Rapozo wasn't al...Shock and amazement.<BR/><BR/>It's not like Rapozo wasn't also repeating the blather that the path was primarily for transportation purposes (belied by the facts of the design) and then that it was "not designed for dogs like paths on the mainland". Again untrue as mainland paths are virtually identical in width. <BR/><BR/>The path was paid for with pork barrel funding specifically designed to do recreational and other services. All that is required is a very tenuous linkage to transportation. Things like visitor's centers, landscaping and purchasing historic battlefields for pete's sake.<BR/><BR/>He and your buddy Mickens just hate the path for other reasons and will use any excuse to attack its use. Bit silly really. There are some decent reasons in opposition, but using made up fluff kills any credibility these guys might have had.<BR/><BR/>Tempest in a teapot for Rapozo posture on camera..Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com