tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3441020117205433950.post8701706392571412792..comments2023-11-04T23:31:40.392-10:00Comments on got windmills?: AS THE FUR FLIESAndy Parxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15398587036690312685noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3441020117205433950.post-2133095235736006612008-05-30T10:42:00.000-10:002008-05-30T10:42:00.000-10:00AG 72-5 is specific to 91-3 regarding the adoption...AG 72-5 is specific to 91-3 regarding the adoption process. <BR/><BR/>But Att. Gen. Op. 81-11 says : Board cannot adopt "policy" which would have the effect of amending a rule, without following HAPA requirements. .<BR/><BR/>It really depends on what a “mission statement” is. And including the word “integrity”- especially, given the history of the lack of such at KPD, could be said to establish “policy which would have the effect of “amending” a rule”. <BR/><BR/>Plus these are all AG opinions and not really legally binding. It would make for one of those very specific and convoluted cases that are actually cited throughout 91.<BR/><BR/>But it’s moot anyway since they now say it was the chief’s message.Andy Parxhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15398587036690312685noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3441020117205433950.post-79765721767635250992008-05-28T11:59:00.000-10:002008-05-28T11:59:00.000-10:00Attorney General Opinion 72-5 says that the statut...Attorney General Opinion 72-5 says that the statutory requirements for the adoption, amendment, or repeal of rules only apply to "rules having the force and effect of law." I think that alone excludes mission statements.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3441020117205433950.post-14580382510968569002008-05-28T09:51:00.000-10:002008-05-28T09:51:00.000-10:00(as previously posted in yesterday's comments sect...(as previously posted in yesterday's comments section)<BR/><BR/>Charley- tell me how a mission statement isn’t perfectly described in saying it “prescribes... policy (and, although only or is required) describes the organization or(and) practice requirements of (the) agency?” (92-1 “Rule”- definition)<BR/><BR/>I don’t understand how it could be clearer.<BR/><BR/>And here some red meat for our morning time-waster--That which is not done accordance with law is illegal... by definition. Thank sir- Can I have another peripherally off-subject prevaricative equivocations..Andy Parxhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15398587036690312685noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3441020117205433950.post-69914792787525620702008-05-27T20:07:00.000-10:002008-05-27T20:07:00.000-10:00Oh you dirty troll. You pointed out our prophet h...Oh you dirty troll. You pointed out our prophet has dirty feet.<BR/><BR/>How can you describe yourself as "detailing" anything when you fail to check the facts and get the details so very wrong so very often, Andy?<BR/><BR/>And to suggest others Google when you so consistently fail to do so yourself is sidesplitting.<BR/><BR/>back to ZZZZZZZZZZZ<BR/><BR/>Our local cop changed his meaningless Chief's message without convening a public meeting for comments. Are you guys that starved for camera time?<BR/><BR/>Talk about straining at a gnat. If you want to be taken seriously, focus on the incidents with real meaning.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3441020117205433950.post-51774454416199718902008-05-27T16:52:00.000-10:002008-05-27T16:52:00.000-10:00You know, the more you call stuff illegal that isn...You know, the more you call stuff illegal that isn't really illegal, the less we believe you when you say it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com