tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3441020117205433950.post3867831103182198742..comments2023-11-04T23:31:40.392-10:00Comments on got windmills?: PNN: A NEW REASON TO VOTE “NO” TO A CONCONAndy Parxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15398587036690312685noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3441020117205433950.post-83158987289060263692008-10-28T09:15:00.000-10:002008-10-28T09:15:00.000-10:00The question is what would make anyone think that ...The question is what would make anyone think that a Concon would address that or any of these things.Andy Parxhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15398587036690312685noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3441020117205433950.post-20614136348018214702008-10-27T11:35:00.000-10:002008-10-27T11:35:00.000-10:00"And they do it all in secret, excluding themselve..."And they do it all in secret, excluding themselves from the basic provisions of our own Hawai`i sunshine laws"<BR/><BR/>Is there anything short of a con-con that can fix that? Not to be a one-note Johnny but if they can do things in secret and transparency is non-existent no other reform is possible.Ed Collhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04478789139917889309noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3441020117205433950.post-80873656516231356572008-10-24T06:21:00.000-10:002008-10-24T06:21:00.000-10:00Aloha!While there are some good points to a few of...Aloha!<BR/>While there are some good points to a few of the possible con-con issues, as I've learned over the years, when I don't completely understand an issue I look to see who is pushing it. The usual right wingnuts are coming out of the woodwork down here.<BR/>That's good enough for me. VOTE NO.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00770756673683557352noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3441020117205433950.post-78371934010049896822008-10-23T21:22:00.000-10:002008-10-23T21:22:00.000-10:00Very well stated, Andy. Thank you.Very well stated, Andy. Thank you.Larryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06742098296808508617noreply@blogger.com