Monday, February 18, 2013
DEAD IS DEAD
DEAD IS DEAD: We can sympathize.
Travel does make you sort of move around in your own little mindless
bubble.
"How do we get from point A to
point B today so we can see and do X, Y and Z that we saw in the
guide book or that our friends told us about?" All else is just
a silly obstacle that is meant for someone else, not us.
When checking to see if we have brought
everything- camera, toothpaste, credit cards, stun gun- we seem to
consistently leave one thing at home... our brains.
Yes the brainless tourist. Here on
Kaua`i we see them every day and become them when we venture
off-island. The inevitable result is that, as an article
on the local newspaper yesterday reminded us (as if we needed
reminding):
In less than two months, Kaua‘i’s
waters have claimed the lives of six individuals — five of them
tourists — compared to a total of four drownings, two ocean and two
freshwater, in 2012.
So what's the
response?
According to the article Dr. Monty
Downs, emergency room doctor and president of the Kaua`i Lifeguard
Association:
“Even when things are going well,
I’m kind of fearful of what can happen,” Downs said. “We
thought we were getting somewhere and came to find out we weren’t.”
Like many others, Downs said the
major issue is visitors “not being informed” about Kaua‘i’s
dangerous ocean conditions.
They're just not being informed. eh?
This implies that while the message is right we just presumably need
to get it out there better or more. The article continues...
Sue Kanoho of the Kaua`i Visitors
Bureau (KVB) agreed, but said there are a wide variety of resources
out there.
“Every year we try to do something
better,” she said. “At some point, it needs to be everybody
sharing the same information.”
And what
"information" is that? The idea is apparently that we're
doing the right thing, just not enough if it. If we could just reach
more people with the same message we're sending now, we could save
more lives.
But guess what- we are NOT doing all we
can to stop people from drowning, as this article tries to claim. We
need to be stark in what we tell tourists. "Please try to be
safe" isn't cutting it.
The fact is that the KVB doesn't want a
more strongly worded message for fear of scaring the tourists away.
It's time for the obvious solution: how
about big warning boxes as you book your Hawai`i vacation, big
banners you can see as you board the plane, as you're leaving the
airport baggage claim area and above all at the check-in desks at all
the hotels and in every restaurant... and finally, on placards on the
desks next to all the TV in every hotel room....all saying something
along the lines of:
"DEATH
awaits you in the ocean. People JUST LIKE YOU go into the water and
DIE ALL THE TIME, sometimes even in calm, waist deep water.
Sometimes they get swept in and DIE JUST STANDING ON THE SHORE
near breaking waves.
Do not think you are special- YOU
CAN AND WILL DIE TOO if you leave your brain behind when you come
here and go to the beach. This is not Malibu. You are in the middle
of the Pacific Ocean. Swimming ONLY at beaches with lifeguards may be
the ONLY WAY to increase you chances of NOT DYING IN THE
OCEAN."
We're not sure if even this will work
but we do know that KVB and HVB have been blocking such stark
language from appearing so as to avoid scaring off tourists. That has
been the case since people suggested it 30 years ago.
Dr.
Downs; you have the power to push the visitors' bureaus into
using language that may cut through the lack of attention to their
surrounding that tourist apparently embrace. You've done incredible
work focusing all of us on ocean safety. There's just one more step-
let's scare the b'geezus out of 'em
Saturday, February 16, 2013
GETTIN' 'FACED
GETTIN' 'FACED: Admittedly we've
been neglectful of our poor "blog"- a term we've finally
stopped cringing at just in time for us to take this little
pre-burnout semi-hiatus.
So where have we been? For those who
haven't noticed, believe it or not we've been on Facebook.
No, not the "she burned my eggs
again at breakfast, how's your mother's gout, what kind of wrinkle
cream is Mich Jagger using," social network but the incredibly
effective, grassroots political organizing tool Facebook.
Yes you heard right. We may be
exaggerating or lacking some objectivity but, for instance,
organizing the effort to get the state legislature to repeal
the creation of the Public Land Development Corporation (PLDC)
could not have been anywhere near as effective without the Abolish
the PLDC working group as well as the just plain day-to-day
political conversations that Facebook lends itself to.
As more and more sign up, Facebook has
gathered together many of the
"usual suspects"- political activists and organizers
around the state that have seemingly in many ways been key to efforts
to expose and publicize some of the more horrendous abuses by PLDC
stalwarts State Senators Malama Solomon and Donovan Dela Cruz.
Solomon especially, has tried every
dirty trick in the book and some we've never before seen attempted in
almost 40 years of legislature observation (with attempted neighbor
island participation)... from blocking hearings through verbal and
even physical intimidation, to bursting into hearing rooms and going
on screaming jags, to political intimidation as committee chair
(threatening members with denial of hearings for "their"
bills and essentially killing them) if members made any noise about
her shenanigans. Said shenanigans include a "gut
and replace" of a PLDC repeal bill introduced by Sen. Laura
Thielen- who
has
been
exposing
Solomon's sh*t on her blog, for example, making signatures on the testimony of
many who noted a specific repeal bill now appear to favor a bill that
would keep the PLDC in place.
It was through Facebook that a petition
with hundreds of signatures was organized to remove Solomon from her position as
Chair. Some think that this petition helped convince
Solomon that she was not going to keep her devious efforts
surreptitious and away from the public eye.
There is even an effort well under way
to, if not remove her from office, at least to organize for her defeat
in the next election. No politician- even one as bold, brash and
boisterous as Solomon- needs this, especially winning her first
election (after having been appointed to the senate from her former
house seat) in a squeaker to a popular former mayor of Hawai`i
Island.
The Facebook petition- originated and
organized by a Democratic Party leader on Maui and publicized by a
blog post at Civil Beat- was
thought by many observers to have, if nothing else, helped focus the
attention of both members of the public and other legislators on
Solomon's actions. Some long time legislative observers say that no
one trusts Solomon at all at this point, and likewise no one wants to
be seen to be "on her side."
All eyes, public and legislative,
are on every single word of any PLDC related bills in and coming out
of her committee.
"Staffers have their uku combs
out" when it comes to Malama's PLDC bills said one.
The focus and petition have even
spawned some real "out there" conspiracy theorists trying
to find a "there there" when there actually wasn't any at all,
showing the level of grassroots attention that is now being paid to
making sure that a clean repeal bill comes out of the senate-
preferably one identical to the one passed by the whole house last
Monday (2/11) so it can go directly to the governor’s desk without
passing "Go" and having to be "reconciled" in a
conference committee--which would give Solomon and Dela Cruz one last
bite at the abuse-of-process apple and delay passage possibly until
May- something house members greatly fear.
"We (legislators) just want this
to be over early in the session so we can move on to important things
like the budget," said Kaua`i Rep Derek Kawakami (D 14th- North
Shore) who, though he originally supported the PLDC said during a chance early January post office
interview, that he was now resigned to repeal.
If you'd like to testify at this point, ask for a bill containing a "clean, full repeal of the PLDC,
preferably one identical to one the house passed" without
referring to a bill number- and email it to sens@capitol.hawaii.gov .
Of course that's not the only thing
being organized through Facebook these days. Many activists are
working against
GMOs and for labeling as well as dozens of other efforts, sharing
bill numbers, gathering testimony, getting the word out when hearings
are set and performing many other essential tasks that, until now,
were performed through email. But unlike email, Facebook allows
anyone to peruse and latch on to, duck in and out of, and instantly
participate in the effort(s) of their choice- or not- whether it's
local, state or national, whether it's legislative or purely through
outside the system efforts- or somewhere in between.
The best feature is that it's
instantaneous and allows conversations between dozens or even
hundreds of individuals, allowing hundreds if not thousands of
interested parties to look over the shoulders of those discussing the
best way to, say write testimony and/or lobby and/or organize events,
rallies and/or meetings.
Many even feel satisfaction that
they've been able to turn one of the most time-wasting symbols of
American vacuousness into a heretofore unparalleled tool of truly
grassroots activism.
Regarding Facebook itself, of course it's a clunky horrendous
system controlled by a bunch of greedy little twerps, bent on control
and profit using people's personal information so as to sell them
more crap which they don't want or need, reaching new heights of
consumerism.
The "staff" are apparently
unable to stop tripping over their own feet every time they try to
"monetize" the monstrosity they've created and the tradeoff
is that everything you say is there forever in the public domain.
And the majority of the people there
are still there to tell their "friends" what Hollywood
movie didn't totally suck and post pictures of their assorted and
sundry genitalia.
And, there are also pitfalls, not just
for activists but for politicians- especially the phonies and
jerk-wads- who dare to step into the fray.
Case in point, one of the most
despicable human beings- not just politicians but people in general-
it has ever been our displeasure to have met personally:
Representative James "Can't Keep His Pants On" Tokioka (D-
15th District- Kapa`a; Lihu`e).
(The kinder gentler Rabid Reporter
we've referred to of late is finding out that the trick is to be
benevolent to and considerate of the feelings of friends and lovers,
but not necessarily so much for total sc*mbags like Tokioka who
consciously and consistently prey on the public trust for fun and
profit without one iota of true public service behind their efforts.)
This slimy little pr*ck has
consistently been "for" one thing- Jimmy Tokioka- for a
couple of decades, first as a Republican councilmember on Kaua`i who
managed to lie, cheat and finagle his way to reelection every two
years until he somehow cut a deal to "replace" our retiring
original-good-old-boy machine-made-man Ezra Kanoho by switching
parties and, somehow, managing to get elected- and reelected- without
ever facing any opposition.
Although it's been said about many ever
since- including about Tokioka himself- Kanoho was the first to have
it be said about him that he was "the man who never met a hotel
he didn't like."
Please- someone- run against this guy.
Unless you're on the sex offender list or fail to bathe regularly or
something, you're probably a shoo-in.
Until the last dog dies, Tokioka was a
stalwart supporter of the defeated House Speaker Calvin Say and
apparently remains bitter about the defeat and loss of his power that
was derived from his support of Say. He remains staunchly pro-GMO and
his list of contributors reflect a corporate debt.
As a long time
corporate-bought-and-paid-for shill, he was a main force behind the
PLDC on the house side and was on the house committee where various
PLDC related bills were heard.
His list
of campaign contributors indicates a man with a corporate
indebtedness. His top ten PAC contributors include Monsanto, A&B
and American Resort Development Association Resort Owners Coalition
Pac (ARDA Roc-Pac) while his top ten individual contributors include
lobbyist supreme John Radcliffe and infamous Republican resort honcho
Lynn McCrory- a thick gruel of PLDC supporters indeed.
So this week when the repeal of the
PLDC was up for a vote in the full house, even though he had been
embarrassed into completing a unanimous vote for full repeal in
committee he was apparently still fuming and beholden to his
corporate backers.
Observers say Tokioka was apparently
trapped and couldn't get out from behind the table and out of the
room before the vote and would have made headlines had he tried- or,
as an alternative, vote against the repeal bill. The acquiescence of
those who had been blocking repeal in the house came literally as a
last-minute surprise when those opposed to repeal saw the handwriting
on the wall and, after verbally listing all the reasons they were
against repeal suddenly turned on a dime to allow the full repeal to
pass out of committee. Even the bill reads as if it were going to
keep the PLDC, only to repeal it in the last couple of sentences.
So it was no surprise that Tokioka was
notable for his absence from the "unanimous" vote of the
full house to pass a "clean, full repeal" of the PLDC.
Well, starting a day or so after the
vote the "Abolish the PLDC" Facebook group- which has
apparently become one "source" for a few reporters in the
state looking to "feel the pulse" of PLDC opponents- began
discussing Tokioka's absence from the full house vote and the subject
was seeming to threaten to make headlines in one publication or
another.
So all of a sudden, in the middle of
one the many conversation "threads" that were becoming more
and more critical of Tokioka's action- or lack of it- there was a
"comment" from none other than his vileness his own self.
After thanking one person for seemingly
trying to make plausible excuses for Jimmy he wrote:
To respond to Xxxxxx's question about why I was absent at the time
of the would like you to know it is my dad's 82nd birthday today. In
May of 2012 my dad had a massive stroke and has been bed ridden since
then. Who knows how many more times I'm gonna get to talk to him on
his birthday and between my mom and I we were coordinating the phone
call that could only be done at that time. If you look at the
committee vote, I voted Yes to repeal. I hope that better clarifies
my vote and my actions. (all sic)
Here
we go again. This is quintessential Jimmy Tokioka. Jimmy has made a
career out of grabbing at and yanking on some concocted heart-string
(or is it heart-chain) whenever he is cornered by some act of his
that there's no way to explain his way out of. It's a well worn tool
in his obfuscation and dodge-ball playing toolbox- a tried and true
(to turn the phrase around) "the best defense is a good offense"
ploy.
If you
don't read it carefully it might seems like he had been with his sick
dad- who could drop dead tomorrow- on his 82nd birthday. And even if
you do read it, you'd think there was some kind of reason why if he
had stayed for the vote he would probably never see his dad again.
The
gist seems to have been that only by skipping the vote would he be
permitted to speak to his beloved mother or see his on-his-deathbed
father again... or something like that.
But
the fact is, as alleged by a few of those who were there for the vote
and were discussing Tokioka's absence- and confirmed in a Civil Beat
article
by Chad Blair and Nathan Eagle:
So that's where we've been- in addition
to organizing we've been posting a lot shorter pieces and sharing
articles that we might otherwise weave into a column... had we not
been so lazy of late.
So "friend" us under "Andy
Parx" if you’re interested in seeing what we've been writing
on Facebook. Or you can check in here
now and again- usually daily or so- although we're not really sure if
you have to sign up to see it (another BS feature- don't get us
started...).
We're actually surprised that the
chattering classes- especially those who directly cover the "social
media" have not picked up on this "Facebook as a political
tool" phenomena yet. We just stumbled upon it after family
members and close friends (yes- we do still have some) got
spammed-out and gave up on email and forced us to toss our very soul
into Zuckerberg's zeitgeist
But although we might go back and forth
between feeding this space and the social network cum organizing
tool, Jimmy Tokioka will always be an unwavering slimeball.
Friday, February 1, 2013
STILL CRAZY AFTER ALL THESE MONTHS
STILL CRAZY AFTER ALL THESE MONTHS:
It not something we'd often admit to but occasionally watching a good
political fight can be almost as stimulating as illicit sex.
The emotions behind the charges and
counter charges of two combatants and the laughingly-obvious
concerted half-truths and outright lies all leading up to an orgasmic
first Tuesday in November, then, when it's over we clean it up and go
back to our normal boring life.
Most of the time.
When the arguably all-time most
entertaining of local campaigns- this year's often indecipherable
machination of former Kaua`i Prosecuting Attorney Shaylene Iseri
Carvalho's reelection campaign- came to an end we thought all we'd
have were the sweet memories.
Even when an executive
session item on last week's council agenda referred to a
settlement of one of those on the long list of harassment complaints
against Iseri- this time the one by now-rehired deputy prosecutor
Rebecca Vogt- we didn't expect a "for old time's sake"
post-coital, spittle-filled rant from the Queen of Xanadu (ask
around).
Yet there she was on
our screen (7 hours 25 minutes in), doing her best Captain
Queeg impression... all that was missing were the steel balls and
the claim of "that's where I had them.. with the strawberries."
Yes it's all a conspiracy folks- County
Attorney Al Castillo, her opponent and now Prosecuting Attorney
Justin Kollar, Hizzonnah Mayor Bernard Carvalho Jr, the council, Vogt
herself and a cast of dozens- they wanted her out and would do
anything to achieve their goal of stopping Iseri from protecting
Kaua`i... presumably from the likes of them.
For those who missed some of the
details of the federal suit revealed when veteran Kaua`i reporter
Joan Conrow described them in her KauaiEclectic blog, last September
20, she wrote:
The complaint, filed Tuesday in
Kauai Circuit Court on behalf of deputy Rebecca Vogt, raises concerns
about equal pay, gender discrimination, free speech rights and county
ethics violations. It names both the county and Iseri-Carvalho, who
was sued by Councilman Tim Bynum yesterday.
Vogt alleges she was pressured to
support Iseri-Carvalho, who rewarded employees she considered loyal.
When Vogt did not actively campaign, she claims she was passed over
for a raise, while five less-experienced male deputies who supported
the prosecutor got hefty pay hikes ...
She says Iseri-Carvalho handed out
the pay raises even though in March — following “sparse
attendance at her major fundraiser” — she had told staff that she
would be cutting salaries due to “budget cuts.”
When Vogt complained about the
arbitrary nature of the raises, and their apparent unethical link to
campaign support, she says Iseri-Carvalho retaliated against her,
giving her more work, denying her comp time and stripping her of the
authority to independently approve plea offers.
Vogt maintains Iseri-Carvalho
violated the county Code of Ethics, which prohibits county employees
from using their positions to secure unwarranted privileges,
advantages and treatment for themselves or others. She also says her
right to free speech was violated when the prosecutor punished her
for speaking up.
The complaint alleges
Iseri-Carvalho's actions were “willful, wanton, outrageous and
oppressive,” and that Vogt suffered job insecurity, income loss,
humiliation, and emotional and physical anguish as a result. The
extent of the retaliation forced her to take a medical leave of
absence, she alleges.
Vogt, who began working for the
Office of Prosecuting Attorney in August 2010, says she had always
received favorable work reviews.
Iseri
claims that, as part of this vast conspiracy, the mastermind, mousey
little CA Castillo- with whom Iseri had been feuding ever since she
stopped answering the council's budget-time questions regarding her
home-made sentencing diversion program- went off and arbitrarily
decided all on his own to settle Vogt's suit without any other input,
especially from Iseri herself.
So is
it true? Could it possibly be true? Well, not exactly.
Because
in cases of employment discrimination and wrongful terminations, you are
not allowed to just go to circuit court and sue.
You are
first required to file a complaint with the Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). The EEOC then does its own
investigation of the complaint, including requesting that the alleged
offender's employer respond to the complaint... something, by the
way, the county has a long history of not doing. Then, if, and only if,
the EEOC finds that there is reason to believe an offense occurred, it
gives permission
to the complainant to sue in circuit court.
That
means that it would have been impossible for Castillo to act totally
on his own to settle the suit just to make Iseri look bad and insure
Kollar's election because the fact that a suit was filed in 5th
Circuit Court meant that the EEOC- which refuses to discuss cases,
which are all "confidential" by law- had already found that
there was reason to believe the complaint was valid.
This
of course is just one factor. In this week's tirade before the
council (which she submitted in writing to the council so it is
public record now) Iseri kept repeating that no one asked her about
"the settlement." But it was hard not to notice that she
kept referring to "the settlement" rather than the facts in
the case which presumably she has had the opportunity to refute-
something she hasn't done publicly.
But
admittedly we don't know, which of course is the point here.
What
we do know is that Iseri was- and still is as far as we know- not
talking to anyone about anything because early in 2012 she "lawyered
up" and got the county to hire her an attorney rather than
answer questions from the council when it asked her for the same kind
of "due diligence" budgetary information it seeks every
year from all department heads.
So is
it over? Was Wednesday's testimony simply one last hopped-up harangue
from our dear "long time comin', long time gone," Miss
Loodacris Lilly?.. a final "say it don't spray it" moment
from one of the most entertainingly delusional public figures Kaua`i
has ever seen- and most likely will ever see again?
Guess
we should just light up a cigarette knowing we'll always have
POHAKU.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)