Monday, April 29, 2013
THE LONELY GURGLE
THE LONELY GURGLE: Anyone who
has perused this space recently would think that the spate of 11
drowning on Kaua`i this year and the tourism industry's tepid
response is an obsession of ours worthy of Melville novel.
Well, dial 1-800-Ishmael. It's
apparently been left to us to point out the less-than-in-your-face
visitor industry tactics that have not only failed to make tourists
sit up and take notice of the fact that DEATH AWAITS YOU OFFSHORE- or
even on the edge of it in a few cases- but have actually obscured the
dangers that await visitors in the water, fearing that an effectively
alarming effort would cause visitors to stay away in droves.
But this past week or so our in-box has
been inundated by readers from Florida to Seattle with copies of an
article
actually calling out local efforts to play down the dangers of the
ocean.
So what local publication was it that
had the guts to publish a piece that challenges the number one
private enterprise in the islands and was so shocking it got picked
up across the nation?
The answer? There wasn't a one... a
local one at least.
Rather, it was from the Associated
Press (AP) wire service, a national- indeed international-
enterprise. The article didn't even have a "dateline"
indicating it could have been written anywhere.
Now that the cat is out of the bag on
the mainland it has apparently become almost impossible for our
"newspaper of record"- The Honolulu Star-Advertiser- to
ignore that side of the story after running half a dozen "they're
doing all they can" pieces.
Today they published-
behind their "pay-wall" no less- not a local
investigative no-holds-barred expose of the way the tourism industry
is murdering tourists for money but the week-plus-old AP piece that
everyone except Hawai`i denizens has been seeing for more than a
week.
Of course not to be outdone, Civil
Beat, the on-line competitor to the S-A, posted a link to a copy of
the AP piece from "News12" in Brooklyn, NY... as part of a
blog
post in which a dozen other links to local news items appeared.
We previously written a series
of posts, detailing, among other things, the slick and
particularly un-scarry "oh by the way- don't drown" video
produced by Mr. Tourism, former Councilmember and still TV star
Dickie Chang and gushingly supported by both the Kaua`i Visitors'
Bureau and the Kaua`i Ocean Safety Council as well as other tourism
industry big-wigs.
Our basic contention
has been that, as we said in early March,:
The message we're getting (from the
tourism industry and kow-towing "ocean safety" crowd) is
"we're doing all we can and we're going to do more to make sure
we send a non-threatening, non-scarey message."
Somewhere there's a disconnect here
because wherever we go all we hear is people saying that the tourism
industry is responsible and needs to change the content of their
warnings, not just put up more and bigger TV screens at the airport
baggage claim showing beautiful ocean scenes and a whispered
voice-over saying "please try to be careful."
The old "if in doubt, don’t
go out" adage is obviously not working. Is it to the point where
we need ads with pictures of the bloated corpses of drowning victims
with something like "The ocean is a killer- this could be you"
written across them?
Is it possible to go too far in the
other direction? Probably. But the answer to sending out an
ineffective message is not to simply make sure that message is
repeated more often in more places.
As to the AP article itself it achieves
many of its goal through understatement. But this quote from State
Rep. Tom Brower (D, Waikiki-Ala
Moana-Kakaako) is shocking for the fact that he actually gave voice
to what we've been assuming all the other mucky-mucks are thinking.
According to the article:
Some legislators think the proposed
video might unnecessarily raise fears or hurt the state's idyllic
reputation among tourists.
"You don't want to be on a
plane and see people getting eaten by sharks..." He added that
ocean safety education is important, but "you don't want to beat
people over the head with it."
No- better they die than not come, eh
Tom?
He's not alone. The AP goes into detail
about how the legislature did do something- they passed a non-binding
resolution politely asking the airlines to play that half-hearted
"nothing to see here" Chang video.
While some airlines hemmed and hawed
and basically said "you first" to each other, they couldn't
even get a comment out of the rest as to why they won't play it
on-board their flights and have left it for Kaua`i County to play it
in the Lihu`e airport baggage-claim area- where tourists always want
to linger and watch videos instead of grabbing their bags and getting
the hell out of there and into the ocean... where they can
drown-in-peace.
There has been a respite in the
drownings of late- apparently even the tourism industry’s best
efforts couldn't keep visitors from hearing about this year's ocean
die-in.
But the all-powerful grip of the
visitor industry on matters of life and death remains the county's
dirty little "pay no attention to the man behind the screen"
official state secret that will undoubtedly take more lives once the
current hub-bub dies down.
Wednesday, April 17, 2013
IF YOU CAN BELIEVE YOUR EYES AND EARS
IF YOU CAN BELIEVE YOUR EYES AND
EARS: If you've read either Joan
Conrow's recap of yesterday's council budget hearings, where her
thus-far twelve
chapter "Abuse Chronicals" were front and center during
a grilling of Planning Director Mike Dahilig, or amazingly enough the
local
newspaper story about it, you know that something, as usual,
stinks at the Lihu`e Round Building and vicinity.
Despite long repeated sessions over the
past few years between the council and the planning department
assuring the latter that the former would provide all the resources
necessary to make sure that Transient Vacation Rentals (TVRs) in non
Visitor Destination Areas complied with the law, it has been left to
Joan to detail a dozen of the more egregious non-compliance cases...
with no action on the part of the county.
The new TVR laws legalized them in the
late '00s but included provisions that they had to have been TVRs
before the law was passed and that they comply with all existing
building and land use laws prior to issuance.
So how's that workin' out for us?
Well apparently, according to records,
Conrow has showed most of them were never in compliance to begin with
but were passed anyway by Dahilig's predecessor Ian Costa- the well
known Good Old Boy (GOB) who was fired as "Acting" (because
he wasn't actually qualified) Planning Director amidst an FBI
investigation in late 2010 and is now ensconced in the allegedly
equally corrupt county Department of Parks and Recreation.
But even if- or maybe especially if-
you're read Conrow's chronicles of abuse you really have to watch
yesterday's Council vs Dahilig debacle for yourself to understand
the hubris of, and outright stonewalling by, the administration.
Dahilig took the job amidst the federal
investigation but hasn't done anything anyone can find to even begin
exposing the alleged corruption much less what Conrow has shown to be
the illegal way the TVR permits were issued. That has left it to
Conrow's investigatory prowess to put pressure on the administration
and get new Prosecuting Attorney Justin Kollar to speak out on the
subject.
.
After a "presentation" at
Tuesday's Planning Department Budget Hearing the TVR discussion
begins at 0:48:39 on the recording. The real "meat" begins
at 1;38:30 with Councilperson Tim Bynum's questioning of Dahilig,
then Mel Rapozo at 2:01:00 and Gary Hooser at 2:15:00.
We're a little less charitable toward
Dahilig than Conrow was in her description today, saving most of her
criticism for Costa who approved most of the TVRs in question. But
by any standard Dahilig stonewalled and tried to run out the clock,
refusing to answer direct questions, hemming and hawing and repeating
flimsy excuses for doing absolutely nothing in his almost
two-and-a-half-years on the job.
The point is that regardless of "who
started it" Dahilig has done nothing despite those persistent
council demands that he ask if he needed more personnel or anything
else and the council had his assurances he had all the resources he
needed. This back and forth happened not just once but over and over
according to strange-bedfellows Bynum and Rapozo who stood ready with
pages of transcripts of those offers and broken promises.
Dahilig was asked over and over by
Hooser, whether there was one- just one case where there was a
document, perhaps "newly discovered," that Conrow might not
have seen... one which would make just one case a false charge.
But Dahilig refused to
straightforwardly say whether he found any of Joan's dozen cases were
incorrect or if she perhaps lacked key documents which Dahilig
claimed could be inside one of the many boxes at the planning
department- right where they have been sitting for the more than two
years since he took office. He couldn't even identify one of those
documents that allegedly "could" exist.
Finally it took Gary having to
extrapolate a flimsy agreement from Dahilig that no- he couldn't
provide even one exculpatory document despite the fact that he’s
been tripping over those boxes of unidentified documents that have
lined the hallways for more than two years.
Well, as they say, we've seen this
movie before. In fact we've written about it many times. It's called
"The
Fog and it's been part and parcel of the way various
administrations have dealt with the council for decades- at times
speaking virtually inaudibly, at others saying "we'll get back
to ya on that" and at others talking a mile a minute on any
subject but the one at hand.
As a matter of fact it was, if not
invented, mastered and perfected by the aforementioned Costa, the
long-time GOBAG (and girls) and the "star" of "The
Fog."
Our suspicion is that either Dahilig is
part of the corruption- or at least the cover-up- or he's trying to
get through this while showing he's a what they call a "team
player," one worthy of continued career opportunities within the
county (or, reportedly, the state) crony system.
If you haven't read Conrow's series
you're missing the best piece of investigative journalism around. But
there's more to come because Kollar seems to be that rare individual
in politics who does not do a 180 after getting elected. Instead he's
continuing to not just talk the talk but he's getting geared up to
walk the walk on TVRs and other issues such as alleged pesticide
poisoning by the bio-tech seed-corn industry on the west side, both
according to a recent radio interview he granted Conrow where the
differences between Kollar and Dahilig were as stark as could be.
This ain't Sinope and we ain't
Diogenes. But with Conrow and Kollar we just could put a dent in the
cronyism that has shackled economic, environmental and social justice
on Kaua`i since plantation days.
(Correction: Ian Costa currently works in
the Department of Parks and Recreation, not Public Works. The in-line
version has been corrected. We regret the error.)
Friday, April 12, 2013
GETTIN' FRISKIES
GETTIN' FRISKIES: Here
kitty-kitty. Here kitty-kitty. Come and get it.
Come and get your new
Obama Cat Food Tax.
Yes, let's call the so-called "chained
CPI"- the most regressive of all possible taxes- exactly
what it is... the tax that will provide the purrrfect meal for the
poorest of the elderly poor.
Because if you're not eating cat food
because it's all you can afford now Grandpa, you will be soon.
Under the proposed creative math in the
President's new budget, those who live solely on Social Security-
sometimes receiving as little as $710 a month to for pay rent,
utilities, food and everything else- will now get even less cash
every month... adjusted, as they say, for inflation.
That means that those who are
infamously only able to afford canned cat food will now have to,
well, presumably eat an even lower quality fare.
"No 'Fancy Feast' you,"
Grandma. "The Cat Food Nazi" says you can only have that
tuna-fish blood-meat stuff that only kitty could love. Or perhaps
down the line, as you slide further and further down the razor blade
of life in the indigent lane, it'll be Meow Mix... if you're lucky.
If not maybe you'll wind up eating
those Purina Cat Chow crackers, especially after your Medicare
premiums go up... assuming you can find a doctor that will treat
"Tender Vittles Syndrome"... if, that is, you can find a
doctor who'll take you when Medicare starts paying physicians a
buck-and-a-half a visit.
So thanks Mr. President. Every time we
hear the can opener we'll be thinking of you.
Sunday, April 7, 2013
SHOCKING REVERSAL
SHOCKING REVERSAL: Another
chapter from the "are you gonna believe me or your lyin' eyes"
department today from an otherwise- or maybe we should say formerly-
unimpeachable source.
In a letter-to-the-editor
of today's local Kaua`i newspaper, former long-time Honolulu
Advertiser Kaua`i Bureau Chief Jan TenBruggencate- who is now the
Vice Chairman of the Kaua`i Island Utilities Cooperative (KIUC) Board
of Directors- excoriates columnist Walter Lewis for a piece
published in the paper on Friday.
In it Lewis basically describes how a
bill headed for apparent passage in the 2013 state legislature would,
in his estimation, allow KIUC to get out from under regulation by the
Public Utilities Commission (PUC).
He leads his column by saying:
The state legislature is currently
considering two companion bills — HB 815 and SB 1045 — which
could remove the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) from much or all
of its regulatory function as to cooperatives.
He goes on to say
how basically KIUC doesn't act like a co-op- something we've covered
extensively in this space- and cites many of the known debacles like
the FERC, federally-controlled hydroelectric projects as well as
pointing out many potential benefits of PUC oversight.
But in
a colorful and many times personal attack on Lewis, TenBruggencate
say that it is not true of the bill and that Walter, as usual in
TenBruggencate's view, has it all wrong. Rather he says:
So who is right?
Well, as an aside, we must point out
first that of course it would "take away no authority" if
indeed "regulatory dockets don't apply to cooperatives."
But to directly address the conflict, maybe the "description"
of the bill will tell us. The official "description" of
SB1045
SD1 HD2 says that it:
Authorizes the Public Utilities
Commission to waive or exempt an electric cooperative operating in
the State from compliance with the provisions of chapter 269, Hawaii
Revised Statutes, as well as any other applicable charters,
franchises, rules, decisions, orders, or any other laws
Sounds clearly like Lewis has it right.
Although if our "aside" is any indication there may be some
wordsmithing going on in TenBruggencate's
letter that could obscures the facts.
We would also add something that
TenBruggencate might not know but
that Lewis- who was one of those most responsible for saving members
up to $80 million in the lead-up to the purchase of the utility-
seems to have forgotten.
One of
the other proposals at the time that Citizens' Utilities was trying
to sell "Kaua`i Electric" was that, rather than setting up
a co-op the county would set up a government owned and run utility.
As a matter of fact, the Kaua`i County Charter contains a section,
passed by voters, on how a "Municipal Power Authority (MPA)"
would work.
But
one of the reasons the co-op idea won out was that decision makers
with the county- specifically County Council Chair at the time Kaipo
Asing and then-Mayor Marianne Kusaka- together extracted a promise
from the co-op's organizing board that they would abide by two
things. The first was that they would adhere to the provisions of the
State Sunshine law which an MPA would have had to do.
The
second was to put themselves under the control of the PUC.
The
first never happened. Like a promised beach access that is fenced as
soon as the construction of a development is finished, the Sunshine
Law provision was obliterated when the by-laws replaced the articles
of incorporation. But nobody noticed because the "nit-pickers"
were too busy going over so many other details of the purchase, using
their time to follow the money rather than the process.
Actually
the group of infamous council curmudgeons led by legendary activist
Ray Chuan. appropriated the name at the time when they were
disparagingly given it by Kusaka for what she called the
"nit-picking" the of the deal- nit-picking which later led
up to the revised price.
And
now the part of about the putting themselves under PUC regulation is
about to be eliminated like the fence that goes up across the beach
access when the development is sold... no matter what our good friend
Jan says and how much virtual spittle he got on his letter.
Unless
there's some provision in the current text of the bill itself to
reverse 180 degrees the purpose/description- something we can't find
but which would make the bill invalid at any rate because a bill is
supposed to reflect it's original description- it appears that the
one who has a "gross misunderstanding" is our good friend
Jan, not Walter of whom we are more often critical than anything
else... unless that is there are some clever semantics going on on
the part of our pal with the skilled pen
We
invite you to read the bill and both Lewis' and TenBruggencate's
opposing "opinions" and decide.
It
feels funny for the "Rabid Reporter" to be criticizing the
great mainstream, "objective" journalist but apparently
there seems to be a "fiduciary matter" that has turned the
worm.
As
they say, you're entitled to your own opinions but not your own
facts; the description of the bill seems to indicate that this time
for once it's Walter who has a firm handle on those nasty little
facts.
Friday, April 5, 2013
MALAMA ANGINA
MALAMA ANGINA: Sometimes things
stick in your craw. And sometime it helps to know where exactly your
craw is.
For those who haven't heard the story,
earlier this week Ch. 2, KHON-TV News (the one with Joe Moore) led
their 6 p.m. newscast with a story
by Ron Mizutani apparently hand fed to him by Hawai`i State
Senator Malama Solomon who, along with Senator Donovan Dela Cruz, is
the chief super-villain of the PLCD
fiasco.
In the piece, Solomon can be seen
whining and sniveling about some cockamamie email she had gotten from
someone on the Big Island- presumably one of her constituents- which,
shall we say, had some colorful language including exactly one "F"
word and one "GD"
So Solomon did what any senator would
do- she called the cops. According to the story,
Honolulu Police have opened an
investigation and a veteran lawmaker is considering filing for a
temporary restraining order...
"I'm pretty tough skinned
because I've been in politics for many many years as well you know,
but this is the first email that I ever received where I felt that
someone has really threatened or insinuating bodily harm," said
Sen. Solomon (D) Waimea, Hamakua, Hilo.
So what was the
content of the email? References to Guns? Knives? Physical assault?
Although Mizutani
quoted small segment of it we've obtained a copy of the full email,
addressed not specifically to Solomon but to to all state senators
although it does reference her and Dela Cruz in the subject line.
Here it is (all
SIC) with the writer's name redacted:
reps@capitol.hawaii.gov;
sens@capitol.hawaii.gov;
From: XXXXX XXXXXXX
Date: Sunday, March 31, 2013 5:31 AM
To: All Senators
Subject: Senators [for *this* term] Cruz & Solomon
I live on the Big Island but, like many others, know what's going on with...(I suppose "dirty" is too objectionable) *some* legislators---such as Cruz and Solomon.
You know...regarding the citizens of Hawaii having spoken: Repeal the goddamed PLDC!
Maybe somebody should politely remind those two ass clowns: "you live on a fucking *island!*
Just saying.
Times are hard. People are fed up and ready for action---more than you might expect.
Doing the right thing will, in the long run, prevent a bunch of trouble.
I am a peaceful man but will do everything possible legal thing to see to it that these two individuals regret not doing the people's will.
Sincerely,
Xxxxx X. Xxxxxxx
Date: Sunday, March 31, 2013 5:31 AM
To: All Senators
Subject: Senators [for *this* term] Cruz & Solomon
I live on the Big Island but, like many others, know what's going on with...(I suppose "dirty" is too objectionable) *some* legislators---such as Cruz and Solomon.
You know...regarding the citizens of Hawaii having spoken: Repeal the goddamed PLDC!
Maybe somebody should politely remind those two ass clowns: "you live on a fucking *island!*
Just saying.
Times are hard. People are fed up and ready for action---more than you might expect.
Doing the right thing will, in the long run, prevent a bunch of trouble.
I am a peaceful man but will do everything possible legal thing to see to it that these two individuals regret not doing the people's will.
Sincerely,
Xxxxx X. Xxxxxxx
It hard to see
exactly what the physical threat was especially after saying he would
"do everything possible legal thing (sic)" (emphasis
added) which does not of course include violence.
But Solomon didn't
seem like she really read the email.. or if she did was being
purposely obtuse.
"I did call the police chief on
the island of Hawaii to find out who this individual was. I felt that
the email was threatening," Sen. Solomon said. "I'm
seriously thinking of going for a TRO at this moment."
So now she's got cops on two islands
wasting their time on her fantasies.
And apparently crybaby makes three. As
Mizutani says:
Sen. Solomon says Senate leadership
will decide if the Attorney General needs to get involved.
No only that but she's thinking of
clogging up the courts with her paranoia.
Could it be all the attacks on her
integrity and legislative actions have gotten to her and she's simply
gone off the deep end? Could it be the new "Malama
Solomon Must Go" Facebook page was one jab too many?
Hard to say but apparently disingenuity
loves company and everyone wanted to get into the southern (maybe
South Hilo) belle's "oh my I'm about to have the vapors"
act.
"It's just sad and unfortunate.
It was addressed to all senators and some of the cursing in there
clearly cross the line of just a manner in which you try to advocate
for a position," said Sen. Ron Kouchi (D), Kauai, Niihau.
Yes the backroom facilitator of some of
the egregious PLDC shenanigans this session according to senate
sources, Ron "Butterball" Kouchi has crocodile tears,
apparently cause by all of Malama's gorilla dust getting in his eyes.
Oh- and get worse it does Mrs Calabash.
This from Solomon's partner in PLDC crimes and misdemeanors, Dela
Cruz.
"We don't want to intimidate
others from participating. I think everyone has a valid point of view
but we have to be earnest in wanting to contribute," said Sen.
Dela Cruz (D) Mililani, North Shore.
And, stop the music- stop the music.
Senator Clayton "can always be counted on to do something nutty"
Hee just couldn't resist throwing in his less than two cents worth of
brain tissue on the matter.
"There's a civil way to
communicate and I think it's very cowardly," said Sen. Clayton
Hee (D) Kaneohe, Hauula, Kahuku.
Yeah, making up threats and getting
them publicized on TV as "news" is the courageous way to go
about things Clayton.
So is there any way to make the point
to these bozos? Well someone we know suggested a wake up email- make
that many emails- might be in order.
What if all of us- everyone reading
these words- copied and pasted the anonymous Big Island emailer's
email and sent it to all the senators (at sens@capitol.hawaii.gov).
It's
time to make like Tony Curtis and scream "I
AM SPARTICUS."
It
just might make Kouchi, Dela Cruz and Hee think twice before getting
all puffy-chested defending someone who is known for bursting into
offices and cussing out and threatening her house and senate
colleagues her own self.
Both
Solomon and Dela Cruz don't come up for reelection until 2016 and
Hawai`i has no provisions for recall. Nice, eh?
Tuesday, April 2, 2013
COME ON IN- THE WATER'S DEADLY
COME ON IN- THE WATER'S DEADLY: It
was a close call but, despite the immediate availability of plenty of
virtual lighter fluid, our hair did remain flameless yesterday when
Kaua`i lifeguards were apparently at the ready, plucking no less than
three tourists from the always dangerous waters of Kalihiwai beach,
according to a county
press release.
You can almost imagine the scene at the
usually un-life-guarded beach: jet-ski-riding rescuers at the ready,
50 yards out, as fun-crazed tourists madly dash into the reported
15-20 foot waves. pushing their children ahead of them, only to be
plucked out of the water and returned to the beach for yet another go
at it, in some sort of insane merry-go-round of potential death.
But perhaps the closest call came on
the North Shore of O`ahu where famed "super-model" Heidi
Klum rescued her son and his nanny from the raging ocean waves.
Klum's "heroic" act is
national news this morning with CNN picking up the Entertainment
Tonight story and dramatic
photos of the rescue. But what the heck she was doing in the
first place- swimming with her seven-year old son at a secluded beach
on a day when some North Shore Beaches were closed due to high surf-
is anyone's guess.
According to a Hawai`i News Now report
Lifeguards think the incident
happened at Papailoa Beach where there was a high surf advisory
yesterday with 10-15 foot waves and a strong north wind.
"It was definitely not a day
for surfing. It was very ugly and rough and challenging," said
Jim Howe, Operations Chief, Ocean Safety & Lifeguard Services.
Papailoa is a remote area on the
North Shore near Haleiwa. It has just one public access, limited
parking and is a restricted area surrounded by expensive homes. It
has potential for big waves breaking close to shore which causes the
riptides.
Forget for a moment the "restricted
area surrounded by expensive homes" part even though beaches in
Hawai`i are not just public property but are supposed to have open
access provided, according to the state constitution.
The bigger question is, "where was
the Hawai`i Visitors' Bureau" (HVB), which, along with the
Kaua'i VB, has come under increasing criticism for what many call a
less-than-effective, "not scarey enough" ocean safety
campaign... especially of late when 10 drowning on Kaua`i already
this year have spawned new efforts like putting an ocean safety video
at the baggage claim area on Kaua`i and trying to get the airlines to
show it on incoming flights.
But perhaps the biggest disconnect of
all came at the end of the article from the same man who had just
described the conditions as being
"very ugly and rough and challenging."
As for Klum's lifeguard skills, the
pros complimented her and may even give her an award for her actions.
"My North Shore lieutenant
suggested we give Ms. Klum one of what we call our Merit Awards for
rescuing her loved ones. I think we might find a way to send her one.
We'll see if she'll accept it or not," said Howe. "I think
what we'd like to say to Ms. Klum and her family is congratulations
on being such a good mom and so vigilant, and being Johnny on the
spot to stop a situation that could have been much worse."
No- no, no, no, no, no- no award...
unless it's a "Doofus of the Year Award" for going to, not
just a beach without a lifeguard but, one of the most "private"
beaches you can find and letting your seven-year-old go out in
monster surf, almost getting your kid, his nanny and yourself killed
in the process.
To be fair though it isn't as if the
warnings that our visitor industry are putting out are effective.
And, as anyone who lives in a tourist destination can tell you,
tourists tend to forget to pack their common sense... even famous
people.
The "new" video made on
Kaua`i- one that is supposed to be the model for a proposed state
legislative recommendation for placement on all incoming flights- in
fact stresses the "Disneyland" vision of "your sun
and surf Hawaiian vacation," where jumping off a cliff into
raging surf is okay as long as you're careful and know a few
underplayed facts placed somewhere toward the end of a "make
sure you have fun but liability- both moral and financial- requires
us to warn you" message.
The fact that the head of Honolulu
lifeguard services thinks this is the time for an award rather than
an admonishment is just more proof that those involved in ocean
safety are kow-towing to the visitors' industry.
Rather than put out
skull-and-crossbones-type warnings they are allowing the HVB to
soft-sell the message even contemplating giving out awards for
brainlessness instead of using this teaching moment and grabbing the
bully pulpit by the horns, driving home the message that this is real
life- not Entertainment Tonight.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)